This page explains how VitaSemita chooses topics, sources facts, and corrects mistakes. Our goal is that any claim on this site can be traced back to a credible, checkable source.
How We Choose Topics
We focus on health topics that matter to adults in their 20s and 30s in the United States: preventive screenings, sexual and reproductive health, mental health and sleep, early heart and metabolic risks, common illnesses and injuries, everyday habits, and health insurance. We favor questions people search for year after year over short-lived news, and we prioritize topics where official guidance or solid research gives a clear answer over speculative or trend-driven claims.
Our Sourcing Standard
We aim to back factual claims in our articles with sources such as:
- Government health agencies (CDC, FDA, NIH, WHO, and state health departments)
- Studies published in medical and scientific journals, primarily identified through PubMed and Semantic Scholar
- Original government or organizational announcements (executive orders, agency press releases) when the article is about a policy change
We generally avoid citing preprints (studies that have not yet completed standard journal review); when we do reference one, we describe it as preliminary rather than settled science.
How Articles Are Produced and Checked
VitaSemita articles follow a structured research, fact-checking, and editorial review process. We aim to check specific factual claims (a statistic, a described effect, a causal claim) against the cited source, and to review articles for tone, avoiding exaggerated, alarmist, or absolute language, and language that could be read as an unproven medical claim (for example, claiming something "cures" or "prevents" a disease). We use AI tools to help with research and drafting, and a human editor, who is not a licensed healthcare professional, reviews every article before publication. No editorial process is error-free; see "Updates and Corrections" below for how we handle mistakes.
Editorial Independence
VitaSemita does not accept payment for favorable coverage, and we do not endorse specific brands or products. Where we mention a specific product, company, or organization, it is because it is directly relevant to the story being reported (for example, a company involved in a product recall), not as a recommendation.
Updates and Corrections
When the facts underlying a published article change (updated statistics, revised guidance, or a correction to something we got wrong), we update the relevant section of the article and note the change in an "Update Timeline" at the end of the piece, rather than silently editing the original text.
Comments
Post a Comment